<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Robots and Ethics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.affectivedesign.org/archives/80/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.affectivedesign.org/archives/80</link>
	<description>Exploring Emotional Design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 17:16:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silvia</title>
		<link>http://www.affectivedesign.org/archives/80/comment-page-1#comment-1036</link>
		<dc:creator>Silvia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.affectivedesign.org/archives/80#comment-1036</guid>
		<description>Your comments on robots and emotions are very interesting. This side of robotics design should be placed under ethical scrutiny, because to awake emotions in humans (esp. in kids, or elderly, or disabled) is a very sensitive activity. The IEEE RAS TC on Roboethics just dealt with those issues, see
www.roboethics.org
Regards, Silvia</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your comments on robots and emotions are very interesting. This side of robotics design should be placed under ethical scrutiny, because to awake emotions in humans (esp. in kids, or elderly, or disabled) is a very sensitive activity. The IEEE RAS TC on Roboethics just dealt with those issues, see<br />
<a href="http://www.roboethics.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.roboethics.org</a><br />
Regards, Silvia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
